Search Marketing Articles

Entering into the “Double Tail” of Keywords

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

The “double tail” is what I refer to when a search marketer enters such a specific keyword into their keyword list that it is unlikely to ever seen any impressions, let alone clicks or conversions.

First… what is considered a “tail keyword” in search marketing?

  • Head Term: “apartment complex”
  • Long Tail: “apartment complex listings” (modifier)
  • Long Tail: “San Francisco apartment complex” (geographic modifier)
  • Double Tail: “San Francisco apartment complex listings”

Going after the long tail of keywords means you have already identified your core keywords (for our example, let’s use “apartments”) in the city of San Francisco, California. For our core list we have “San Francisco apartments”, “San Francisco rentals”, “SF apartments” and so on… How do we turn these core keywords (head terms) into long tail keywords?

The most common method is adding modifiers. For example, let’s say we are one of the few apartment complexes that allows pets and want to make sure if someone searches for us can find us; so we might have “San Francisco pet friendly apartments” – this is pretty exact because we know three things about our user: they are living (or looking to live) in San Francisco, they are interested in renting an apartment and they also have a pet or in the processing of getting a pet.

Now how do we take the long tail keyword “San Francisco pet friendly apartments” and go into the “double tail” of keywords? We change our target of San Francisco into a more precise geographic modifier such as a major cross-street, landmark, or neighborhood. For example, someone might want to live by China Town, so we have “China Town pet friendly apartments” (or worse: “San Francisco China Town pet friendly apartments”) – now this is really precise and exact. Instead of knowing that a user is looking in or around San Francisco, we can pinpoint within several blocks where they want to live.

The chance that you will get sufficient search volume (impressions) is unlikely for the above mentioned double tail keyword. First, if a user is interested in a specific neighborhood of San Francisco, they are probably within 10 miles of the city… so instead of the hundreds of thousands of people who are looking to move to San Francisco, we are dealing with maybe a few thousand. Second, we also know that this Internet user is looking for pet-friendly apartments, which means it is a small sub-set of our already several thousand visitors (let’s say 10%) which means we are dealing with a few hundred people every month looking for an apartment online. Third, we have to remember that an average click through rate of your ad might be between 1% - 2% (let’s ignore that whenever a user gets this specific with a term, there is a slim chance that they will click on a paid search listing so 2% is pretty optimistic). After doing some math, we can say that out of 2% of maybe 300 – 400 (given that San Francisco has about a million residents) might be looking for this type of apartment during a 30-day period; which translates to about 3 – 8 visitors a month to our website. What type of conversion rate should we expect for an online “contact us” form? If your contact form is well optimized you can squeeze out 6% - 8% of your visitors to convert into a lead. 8% of 8 visitors is approximately half a conversion a month – so you might be able to get 1 conversion every two months.

Ok, so this isn’t bad. With our double tail keywords we might have paid $0.20 a click which makes our leads cost around $2.50/lead. Now how many “contact us” forms will have accurate contact information – this is another story. Will you follow up with every contact form? That is up to you. How many other contact forms did this user already fill out? In real estate I have seen about 3 – 4 (not including all of the emailing with Craigslist posts).

One thing to note – is that we assumed that all of the people who searched for “China Town pet friendly apartments” were not looking perhaps to buy an apartment, look for a cheap apartment, perhaps look for a room share (remember: the keyword might have been “China Town pet friendly apartments to share” and Google triggered our ad to show because we have a close match keyword). Imagine how long it would take to accurately decide what you want to bid for this keyword, which ad shows (let’s assume you are running three ads – which one triggered the conversion/click and which one just got lucky with a stray click/conversion?) – this amount of data might take up to several years to accumulate which by then Google most likely will have changed guidelines, operations, and new competitors may have entered into the arena.

The double tail of keywords does not work. When companies and advertisers boost to have hundreds of thousands, if not millions of keywords – I wonder how many of them actually drive any of your traffic and can be properly optimized to deliver you revenue.

I have included a chart of the double tail in action and what you need to do in order to improve your campaign optimization.

Now this is a very long tail of keywords – over 75% in this example generates no revenue – maybe a few clicks here and there and if there is any revenue generated – it is so minimal and spread out that it is just considered as noise.

If we consolidate our keywords – and instead of having double tail keywords such as “China Town pet friendly apartments” and just use “China Town apartments” for our San Francisco apartment rental website, we have greatly decreased the number of double tail terms (cat friendly, dog friendly, animal friendly, dog ok, dog allowed, dogs allowed, etc…) and we have made our keyword list a lot more manageable as well as making it easier to optimize.

By eliminating a lot of the keywords in our apartment rental website, we managed to spread the keyword revenue share across fewer keywords through simple consolidation of terms that would never have received the volume to be optimized on their own.

How Large Are Your AdWords Accounts?

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

How large are your AdWords accounts? Do you answer in…

  • Number of Keywords
  • Monthly or Annual Spend
  • Revenue Generated
  • Profit versus Other Channels
  • Other

Do the number of keywords that you’ve uploaded really matter? What about spend (monthly or lifetime of the account)? How about the total revenue search marketing generates for you? Or do you compare the profit search marketing generates over your other marketing channels?

You’ll notice that “ROI-focused” agencies will talk only about three things - they will brag about their client list, show off the total spend across all their accounts, or bring up the millions of keywords that they use… so much for being focusing on your returns!

Invited to SMX Singapore this July

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

I’ve been asked to give a talk about Adgroup Management which will cover how to build a scalable campaign from the ground up by understanding what keywords to place in what adgroup and how to form your adgroups around campaigns in the proper way.

Additionally, I was informed that they most likely will want me to moderate a session as well during the second day.

I’ll be following up with some more updates about this over the next few days.

It’s not the keywords, it’s the funnel.

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

Coming back from SMX London – I decided to write this article on the plane about optimizing keywords versus optimizing the funnel (landing pages and ad creatives). Too many presentations occurred this past week where advertisers and agencies were told to look at their keywords when optimizing their accounts – that keywords are the first step.

I disagree with the philosophy of “keywords keywords keywords”. If my product/service never changes, there are only so many different combinations of keywords that I can upload to my account. Eventually, I’ve exhausted every combination. Sure, over time there might be new competitors that I might want to bid on their trademark terms, or new slangs/variations of my keywords may become popular (from dating to “social dating”) – but for the most part that is just spending an afternoon every few weeks making sure everything is in check.

Eventually, I can only update my bids so many times. You get to the point really fast if you are in a competitive space such as online dating (over 60 advertisers in the US alone on Google) where you can no longer make any dramatic changes to your keyword bids (sure, you might be able to shave off a few pennies over the course of several weeks/months of getting sufficient data – but nothing that a day of work once in awhile can’t handle) – where do you go from here?

I believe first thing first is to optimize either your landing page and/or backend. If all you care about is having a lead filled out on the landing page – then you are killing two birds with one stone – if you are subscription-based (Match, eHarmony, Chemistry) then updating the funnel may or may not be in your control and area of responsibilities (if you are Match with 400 employees – probably not). For us, let us assume that this is some other guy’s problem – and that even though you two should be working side-by-side for whatever reason you aren’t (example: you’re a search marketing agency and your client does not want you poking around with their back-end).

You are left with your landing pages and the creatives that drive users to it. For a website such as Zoosk, we do a lot with the content network (it is no surprise when you hardly see us show up in Google Search). If you work on your creatives, you might be able to boost your click-through-rates from 0.1% to 0.12% which can be great for additionally traffic – but you aren’t freeing up anything to increase any of your bids (which is key if you want to dominate in Google Search). So for us we need to rely heavily on our landing pages (by the way, we must be doing a great job if we spoke at Search Marketing Expo London 2009 ;-) )which requires hours upon hours of brainstorming, designing, developing, testing, and measuring.

At Zoosk we have tried multiple methods of converting our users. With our great presence on Facebook (over 8 million monthly actives if I’m not mistaken) we applied what worked on Faceboook to the traditional online dating world. Our process was not effective for users in the dot com space (can’t discuss the numbers too heavily but if you are/were in the online dating space and saw what we were doing – you can tell it needed some optimization).

Needless to say, we are currently using the traditional online dating model for landing pages of getting as much user information as fast as we can and then hope that if the user gets trapped into the funnel they will eventually convert because we believe that our product is unique with interesting features that many other dating sites do not offer their users.

I would like to think that there is a better way to convert my users and that a landing page can help speed up the process of getting users to subscribe and pay for the service. Even if I decrease my conversion rate by 10% but increase the rate of my user acquisition to wanting to subscribe by 15% — I now have a higher cost-per-acquisition for my “free users” because they are more likely to subscribe than before. This higher cost-per-acquisition can mean the difference from us bidding on position 7 in Google Search to maybe 5 or 6 without changing my keywords or ads – changing this much in my position is a lot more than shaving a few pennies off of my keywords during a multiple-month process (which may not even be effective because by then I can enter into varying shifts in seasonality/trends).

Yes, over the next couple of weeks/months instead of changing my keyword bids from $1.20/click to $1.17/click, I will be making dramatic changes to Zoosk’s funnel and allow us to go from $1.20/click to $1.80/click or even higher by changing the cost per acquisition for new users.

As I mentioned before – by doing this I might drop off on how many users actually complete the new user registration form, so once I open up a new target cost-per-acquisition and meet it, I can then optimize my ads and creatives to increase my click-through-rates and compensate for the missing users.

Keywords… I’ll get to those later. If users start to use terms other than “singles” and “dating” – please let me know – but I’m betting that after 10 years of online dating that I can afford taking a 10 week break from keyword research/expansion to focus on something else.

Note: the cost per clicks used in the post above is just arbitrary numbers… Zoosk would kill me if I disclosed our CPCs

Down to Earth — You Look Familiar

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

Just before leaving London I wanted to pass along a screenshot to a colleague of an ad we are running in the US for an online dating term — found two great text ads on Google sponsored search that were literally one on top of each other and were so amazing… they deserved a blog post.

Below is a screenshot and some comments (gotta love Microsoft Paint!)

Note: DowntoEarth.com was Match.com’s (and parent company IAC) response to PlentyofFish.com (the world’s #1 free dating site)

Quick Recap of SMX London 2009

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Well, being that I am biased and will say that the topic of Landing Pages & Multivariate Testing was the best topic (oh, did I talk about that?) I should probably discuss the second best topic of SMX London 2009.

2nd Best Topic: Writing Killer Search Ads & Landing Pages

I really enjoyed listening to Kate Morris of Marketing Demons.  I think I would have enjoyed Kate’s presentation more had it been first because some of what she discussed was covered first by Kerstin Baker-Ash’s presentation (who was also great).

Another great presenter was Guy Levine who mentioned off-line methods of getting great ad copy. Guy and I had a chat later that day and I mentioned the irony of his presentation: he suggested turning to magazines/newspapers for great headlines and it is our industry (online media) that is killing theirs.

Jon Myers, Head of Search at MediaVest, was the topic’s moderator and did a great job. He really gave the room’s energy a level higher than any other topic. When most moderators go to 10, Jon went to 11.

The networking was fabulous.

Well it wouldn’t be SMX without Rand Fishkin of SEOMoz now would it? I think I may have accidentally told Rand that I’d send him a few articles for his blog — which means anything that would have been worthwhile to read on this blog might now show up somewhere else ;-)

It goes without saying to give a big shout-out and thanks to both Chris Sherman and Fanny Jeanmougin for putting on SMX London and letting me speak. I look forward to SMX London 2010 and being able to present again.

As far as other smart people that attended the conference — It was awesome meeting Heath from Sony Europe. Words can not describe what a sharp guy Heath is in sales/marketing — maybe we will get the pleasure of having him speak at the next SMX because it would take Zoosk leaps and bounds to use a few pages from his playbook and apply them to our current strategies.

How to Add New Tracking when Your (or Client’s) Dev Team Says No

Monday, May 18th, 2009

During SMX London there was a great question that was asked to my panel. The question was “How to you deal with clients who’s developers are against always dropping your pixels in when you need to add new analytics?”

This was a really great question. Lately, I have been working at Zoosk so I have not had this problem but did manage to think of an answer (one that I wish I thought of having to deal with the same problem).

My suggestion: use a 1×1 pixel iframe.

I have found that when dealing with clients that it is easiest to have their developers drop in any pixels that you want when they first get signed. If you ask them to drop in an iframe that loads some page from one of your servers, you can drop in any javascript pixels that you wish on that page and not have to go to the developers. What is also great about this, is that you never have to worry about load time - the developers will never have to complain that your pixels are causing the page to load because it is locked away in an iframe and you won’t have to worry about distracting the user experience with the size of it being 1 pixel by 1 pixel.

So next time you take on a client, or if you are an in-house internet marketer — try to get the developers to drop in a 1×1 iframe pixel that loads a page on a server that you control and allow you to drop in any javascript pixels that you want to fire without always having to ask permission from the dev team.

Google is Very Confused - Zooks, IA now a Typo

Monday, May 11th, 2009

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=zooks

Google now thinks that “Zooks” — which is an actual town in Iowa is a typo for the dating website that I am currently working for: Zoosk.

How Much Money Will You Make Tomorrow?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

So some of the more sophisticated internet marketers and affiliates that I know use some sort of basic rules based bidding to decide whether a keyword should be bid up, down or paused. Some even apply similar principles to ads/landing pages to decide whether they need to pause something.

Wouldn’t it be great to do something that wasn’t rules based? Something that would work for nearly every industry out of the box and can adapt to changes in your website?

My topic (I think I”m given about 10 - 15 minutes?) is about multivariate landing pages and testing. I’ll go into details and show how you can predict landing page conversion rates (yes, wake up every morning and already know how much money you will make) and determine whether something will back out (I don’t care if I get 1,000 new users for $0.01/each if none of the pay me money) — oh and by the way, you’ll be able to apply all of this to your keywords and the rest of your marketing strategy (yes, I said it!)

Register now for SMX London (http://searchmarketingexpo.com/london)

Invited to Speak at SMX London May 18th

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

… no big deal.

Today I recieved an email from Search Marketing Expo about whether I’d like to speak on May 18th about Multivariate Testing.

I haven’t decided on whether I will accept because of all of the madness with everything else in my life but you know if I decide to go then it will be off the hook. I’ve done my research on the other speakers and pretty sure I know exactly what they will be talking about and will be able to wow the audience about advanced tactics that are five years ahead of what they are doing.

I’ll have to sleep on it and will post tomorrow whether or not I will be in London this May. There are a lot of other great speaking events and still waiting to hear back from two other conferences this summer :)